What are the pros/cons for a headless instrument?

Pros: smaller/shorter instrument. They’re great for travel as they fit in an electric guitar sized gig bag. They work well if you find yourself on small, crowded stages (small clubs, coffee houses, orchestra pits, etc..). Sonically, they typically possess a more staccato attack which is great if you play anything percussive. They’re lighter and easier to wear on longer gigs.
Cons; the changing of strings can be a little tricky. They lack a little bit of the fullness and resonance you experience from a build with a headstock. On the 5 and 6 strings; the nut width is a bit wider than my usual spacing via a hand carved nut. This is due to the dimensions the hardware is made to accommodate.

What is the lightest wood, suitable for a bass, that doesn’t compromise the sound/construction? I guess this would include fingerboards, as they also contribute to overall weight.

The lightest body woods I’ve used are Paulowina, Spanish Cedar, and the super light varieties of Swamp ash. They all work, but yield a softer overall attack. I’ve had my best tonal success (while keeping weight down) by using alder or hemlock. For fingerboards; the softest/lightest I’ll use is Indian Rosewood…..and that is rare. I gravitate towards more dense woods for fingerboards for both tone and functionality.

I’ve never owned a Muckelroy “yet” or any bass that didn’t have a painted finish. One question that I’ve been wondering, what types of oil (oils, mixture etc) do you use for sealing your basses and how many coats or applications do you apply to each one, and does different wood types require less or more? And does an owner of one of your basses need to periodically reapply?

I use a three part mixture of teak oil, thinner and semi gloss poly. I use between 3 and 6 coats depending on the woods involved. Woods that are less dense or more open-pored tend to drink up a little more, requiring more coats.
Owners of instruments with this type of finish do not need to reapply this oil. For maintenance and cleaning, I recommend a product called Howard Feed & Wax. It’s great on the body, neck and fingerboard…..especially the fingerboard. Howard Feed & Wax can be applied either every 6 months or during string changes. You simply apply a small amount to a soft dry cloth, wipe it on, let it sit for a few minutes and wipe off the excess with another soft dry cloth.

Is there a wood type or model, when someone commissions, that you kind of, in the back of your head dread, as it’s tedious to deal with?

definitely. Anything with a pickguard for sure. Anything with P or J pickups. Those take a ton of extra prep work and time to route. Extended range (7 strings or more) can be a chore. Set neck is also one of those things that I have to really be in the right head space for. As for woods; buckeye burl is one that ends up being very tedious to deal with. Last but not least; CA glue treatments on fretless fingerboards. I love the result, but the process knocks me out of commission for a few days.

Q: Why a pickguard?

A: they take a lot of time to make (especially the wooden ones). One tiny mistake and you have to start from scratch.

Do you endorse bassist? I’m in a funk fusion jazz trio.

funny. To anyone wondering what the heck is going on here, it’s a long standing “funny ha ha” based off an email I received about endorsements. IYKYK.

In regards to endorsements;

I have a few artists who constantly bring value to my brand. They are doing it right! Looking downrange, I doubt I’ll be taking on any new artists unless things work out to where my company grows. For now, I’m proceeding with caution.

Can you share some insight on the muck pre? Frequencies you chose, design, etc? That mid freq is just in the right place.

Prior to building, I was an endorser of Bee Basses. Fred Bolton (Bee basses owner/builder) had a friend making these preamps for his basses. His name is Dave McKeen. When I received my first Bee bass, I couldn’t believe my ears. It was like pulling the blanket off the cab! When I began building, Dave was one of the first people I called. We moved a few center frequencies around. The bass is centered at 40hz, mids at 560hz and treble at just under 7khz. The thing that sets this apart from other 3 bands is the musicality you will experience. Set flat, there is an overall 3db of gain which causes your signal to hit the amp with more clarity. It’s like a souped up version of what your bass sounds like passive. Each band has a full 18db worth of boost or cut. It is extremely powerful. Something I enjoy about this preamp is how the bass boost doesn’t get out of control. Things stay tight and focused. These are top shelf, hand made by Dave and in extremely limited supply.

Beyond the center-block, neck & fret board woods, what difference in sound do the wing woods bring?

On a neck through build, the wings don’t have as much of a tonal contribution as a neck/body combo you’d experience from a bolt neck. The wings are more-so along for the ride. Some of the heavier/more dense woods can weigh in a bit tonally. Most of my builds are geared towards being lighter vs heavier. With neck through, the majority of the tonal influence comes from the neck woods and the fingerboard. The wings (especially if they’re on the lightweight side) serve more of a means of weight reduction, giving a more neutral tonal response. The wings are important to the overall full body resonance of the instrument. So; with that in mind, they are part of the sound of the instrument.